Background
This Confluence page outlines the key factors to consider when evaluating OpenVidu and Jitsi for the integration of a video conferencing platform.
Both solutions have their strengths and considerations, and this guide aims to help you make an informed decision.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Scalability and Performance
OpenVidu
- Docker-based architecture for scalability.
- Efficient handling of large-scale conferences.
- Dynamic allocation of resources based on demand.
Jitsi
- Designed for scalability with the ability to handle a significant number of participants.
- Optimized for WebRTC-based communication.
2. Ease of Integration
OpenVidu
- Comprehensive API for easy integration into custom applications.
- Supports multiple programming languages.
- OpenVidu has a RestAPI that can programmatically generate sessions and tokens.
Jitsi
- Simple integration via iFrame or API.
3. Security and Privacy
OpenVidu
- End-to-end encryption for increased security.
- Role-based access control.
- Token-based authentication.
Jitsi
- Secure by default with TLS encryption.
- Support for password-protected meetings.
- Open-source and auditable for transparency.
4. User Interface and User Experience
OpenVidu
- Minimalistic UI for ease of use.
- Customizable UI components for integration with existing platforms.
Jitsi
- Intuitive and user-friendly interface.
- Support for additional features such as chat and screen sharing.
5. Customization and Extensibility
OpenVidu
- Extensible architecture for adding custom modules.
- Customizable UI components.
Jitsi
- Open-source codebase allows for extensive customization.
- Ability to add plugins and extensions.
- Provides additional SDKs for mobile. This might be helpful in integration to CHO/FLW App later.
6. Community and Support
Both OpenVidu and Jitsi are open-sourced. It looks like Jitsi has a more active community.
7. Cost Considerations
Both solutions are
- Open-source
- No licensing fees.
8. Documentation and Resources
Available for both platforms.